 |
Help Make
Peoplehood a Verb
|
|
|
Let's Learn A Little About (and maybe from) Each Other
When we look at each other and see ourselves reflected in
the other, we are one together. And then disagreements can serve
to delight. But when we look upon each other and see only where we
diverge, disagreement turns to disparagement and delight turns
to distain. And our sense of being one people, one family is
diminished.
If the notion of Jewish Peoplehood means
anything, it represents a desire to heal the denominational divide, and
what is seen as an Israel-Diaspora divide. It means not looking at
a fellow Jew as the other, and not thinking "why can't you
reasonable and see it my way/be more like me." Peoplehood is a verb.
It means seeking out, learning, and engaging.
Peoplehood does not mean engaging with the other in order
to try to convert the other to our way of thinking or doing (at least not all the time). And it does not
mean we can't or shouldn't talk and argue about those
things we on which we disagree (at least some of the
time). But it does mean we spend time focusing on, and
celebrating, what we share. It means seeing what we have in common with
each other and delighting in differences and diversity.
It begins with being
genuinely curious about Jews with different political, religious and
cultural outlooks, learning about those differences and then discovering
the beliefs (religious and political), outlooks, concerns, joys and
sorrows we share.
A person might think, “Since the House of
Shammai declare unclean and the House of Hillel clean, this one
prohibits and that one permits, how, then, can I learn Torah?Scripture
says ‘Words . . . the words . . . . These are the words. . . ‘ All the
words have been given by a single Shepherd, one God created them, one
Provider gave them, the Lord of all deeds, blessed be He, has spoken
them. So make yourself a heart of many rooms and bring intro it
the words of the House of Shammai and the works of the House of Hillel,
the words of those who declare unclean and the words of those who
declare clean.”
Tosefta, Sotah 7:12
We can begin with easy baby steps. Over
the Internet. By exploring the web sites of those whom we see as different Jewishly. Not
just once, but often enough to begin to understand and connect, By
signing up for their newsletters. By looking at their contrary
views not with the idea of convincing them to "convert" but rather to
see, beyond the rhetoric, the places they are coming from in an attempt
to understand and to be sympathetic to those divergent views and places.
And by encouraging friends, relatives and congregants to do so.
Here are a few places to begin exploring different Jewish views
on politics, religion and lifestyle.
Places to begin to see the world through the Jewish eyes of those
with different political views:
If you're on the left,
visit:
The Jerusalem Post.
As described on wikipedia.org:
"While it was once regarded as left-wing, the paper
underwent a noticeable shift to the right in the late 1980s. Under the
new ownership and editorial leadership of editor-in-chief David Horovitz
since 2004, the paper's political identity has moved to a more complex
centrist position. Examples of this shift include support for the August
2005 disengagement from the Gaza Strip and the paper's advocacy for
privatization of Israeli religious institutions."
Commentary
Magazine. As described on wikipedia.org:
"Commentary Magazine is a monthly American magazine on
politics,Judaism social and cultural issues. . . . The magazine was one
of the leading voices of neoconservatism by 1976, and remains
so today, although in the 21st century it has less influence than
before. Benjamin Balint says it was the "Contentious Magazine That
Transformed the Jewish Left Into the Neoconservative Right" Historian
Richard Pells concludes that "no other journal of the past half century
has been so consistently influential, or so central to the major debates
that have transformed the political and intellectual life of the United
States."
World Jewish
Digest
Arutz Sheva. As
described on wikipedia.org:
"Arutz Sheva is an Israeli media network identifying with religious
zionism . . .. Arutz Sheva sees itself as "the only independent national
radio station in Israel" and a counterbalance to "the 'negative
thinking' and 'post-Zionist' attitudes so prevalent in Israel's
liberal-left media." . . . Arutz Sheva is regarded as the voice of
the Israeli settlement movement."
The Israel Project.
As described on wikipedia.org:
"The Israel Project (TIP) [as it is described by its
supporters] 'works tirelessly to help protect Israel by improving
Israel's image'. In their online mission statement they describe
themselves as being "devoted to educating the press and the public about
Israel while promoting security, freedom and peace."
Criticism of TIP includes describing it as 'a right-wing
media advocacy group' using 'pro-settlement fear-mongering talking
points' which are "incendiary, dangerous, and counterproductive",and
argue that its rhetoric and alliance with extremist figures only serves
to simultaneously undermine the image of the State of Israel and TIP's
stated purpose."
If you're on the right:
visit:
The Forward newspaper. As
described on wikipedia.org:
"The publication began in 1897
as a Yiddish-language daily issued by dissidents from the Socialist
Labor Party of Daniel DeLeon. As a privately-owned publication loosely
affiliated with the Socialist Party of America Forverts achieved massive
circulation and considerable political influence during the first three
decades of the 20th Century. . . . As the influence of the
Socialist Party in both American politics and in the Jewish community
waned, the paper joined the American liberal mainstream though it
maintained a social democratic orientation. The English version has some
standing in the Jewish community as an outlet of liberal policy
analysis."
Haaretz newspaper.
As described on wikipedia.org:
Haaretz describes
itself as broadly liberal on domestic issues and international
affairs. It is described [by others] alternatively as
liberal, centre-left, left-wing and hard left, . . . as "Israel's most
vehemently anti-settlement daily paper." According to the BBC it has a
moderate stance on foreign policy and security issues. . . .
US
weekly The Nation describes Haaretz as "Israel's liberal
beacon," citing its editorials voicing opposition to the occupation, the
security barrier, discriminatory treatment of Arab citizens, and the
mindset that led to the Second Lebanon War.
The New Israel Fund. As
described on wikipedia.org:
"NIF describes itself as "the leading organization
committed to democratic change within Israel" and its objective as
"social justice and equality for all Israelis." It envisages Israel as
"a state that ensures complete equality of social and political rights
to all its inhabitants, without regard to religion, race or gender." It
advocates for civill and human
rights, religious tolerance and pluralism, and closing the sociall and economic in
Israeli society, especially those among Jews and Arabs.
NIF is
opposed to the global Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign.
It has stated that it does not support global BDS and will not support
organizations with BDS programs but that its policy allows NIF the
discretion to "engage in dialogue with an important organization that
signs one letter supporting divestment rather than summarily dismissing
them". Naomi Paiss, Director of Communications described the campaign as
"a tactic that embodies the message that Israel cannot and will not
change itself, and for that reason, we think it is inflammatory and
counter-productive". Jeffrey Goldberg writing in The Atlantic,
criticized NIF for not defunding grantees that "support BDS, even
incidentally", describing it as a "bright-line" issue."
Ir Amim.
As described by NGO Monitor (http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/ir_amim)
"Ir Amim’s activities include “Monitoring and exposing
critical developments in Jerusalem,” “legal advocacy,” “policy
advocacy,” and running highly politicized "tours" of Jerusalem and the
separation barrier.
Although it has been described as “work[ing] toward
coexistence in Jerusalem,” an Ir Amim official said that the group was
“seeking to advance a political agenda, and was not an organization
geared to promote coexistence.”
Ir Amim promotes the Palestinian narrative on Jerusalem,
including claims that "government powers" are being handed over to the
settler organizations” and "archeological digs have become an important
tool in the fight for control of [the area around the Old City].”
Ir Amim minimizes the security threat to Israel, for
instance on the Shuafat Refugee camp– “With respect to security, Shuafat
RC is an overcrowded and impoverished Palestinian ‘ghetto’ in the heart
of Jerusalem whose inhabitants defy Israeli control; it is thus
perceived as a potential security threat by Israeli authorities (despite
the fact that the camp has never been a source of major security
problems)”
|